She wanted to prove that nurture was more powerful than nature. Studies show that both play a strong role in child development, but that nature is more impactful overall. [ or at least this is implied to be the case (in studies) in her canon. ]
But removing someone from their people by force isn't a kindness. Stealing a child isn't kindness. And even if nature is stronger than nurture, you can't predict who is going to overcome their nature. Or when.
Her desire to improve the way people view githyanki as a whole would hurt individual githyanki. Not only that, but it passed a clear judgment on their culture from the start.
I understand what you mean about the world. It is complicated. Innocent actions can do harm. Not just those motivated by misguided righteousness, but even ones made with completely pure intentions. We just... can't always know what the exact impact of our actions will be.
I don't think that the line between good and bad is in one spot. I don't think that it's a straight line either. I'm not even sure I would call it a line at all, I suppose, but there is a time and place for a judgment call to be made about who can be trusted to stay in Heaven.
I certainly don't mean to imply you're anything like that.
[she was a horrible lady and they very rightly just pickpocketed all her money and fled. like good people who know heaven's light would do.]
But sometimes I feel a bit like that egg, maybe. I don't know if I want my life to prove a point. I just want to live it, and if I happen to decide I want to be nice and embarrassing things like that, that's my business.
[so that's sort of the feeling at the core of her reservations, but...]
On the other hand, it's not as though if you have a system that operates on judging the morality of people that you can take their own word for it.
[ she just kind of. thinks out loud about anything she's discussing with someone. ]
... Whether they're good or bad choices, they should be your own to make. Not dictated by someone else's goals, forced on you at birth. Or, in a way, forced on you after death. If all a person could be was a pile of expectations, they would hardly be their own person at all.
[ and a little nod at that last part. ]
It's complex. Even societies without official forms of leadership still develop their own social rules and expectations of each other. I don't know that having official moderation is necessarily the perfect solution. But I don't think that it's a bad thing, either.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
But removing someone from their people by force isn't a kindness. Stealing a child isn't kindness. And even if nature is stronger than nurture, you can't predict who is going to overcome their nature. Or when.
Her desire to improve the way people view githyanki as a whole would hurt individual githyanki. Not only that, but it passed a clear judgment on their culture from the start.
I understand what you mean about the world. It is complicated. Innocent actions can do harm. Not just those motivated by misguided righteousness, but even ones made with completely pure intentions. We just... can't always know what the exact impact of our actions will be.
I don't think that the line between good and bad is in one spot. I don't think that it's a straight line either. I'm not even sure I would call it a line at all, I suppose, but there is a time and place for a judgment call to be made about who can be trusted to stay in Heaven.
no subject
[she was a horrible lady and they very rightly just pickpocketed all her money and fled. like good people who know heaven's light would do.]
But sometimes I feel a bit like that egg, maybe. I don't know if I want my life to prove a point. I just want to live it, and if I happen to decide I want to be nice and embarrassing things like that, that's my business.
[so that's sort of the feeling at the core of her reservations, but...]
On the other hand, it's not as though if you have a system that operates on judging the morality of people that you can take their own word for it.
no subject
[ she just kind of. thinks out loud about anything she's discussing with someone. ]
... Whether they're good or bad choices, they should be your own to make. Not dictated by someone else's goals, forced on you at birth. Or, in a way, forced on you after death. If all a person could be was a pile of expectations, they would hardly be their own person at all.
[ and a little nod at that last part. ]
It's complex. Even societies without official forms of leadership still develop their own social rules and expectations of each other. I don't know that having official moderation is necessarily the perfect solution. But I don't think that it's a bad thing, either.